Questions for the 5. 21 Board Stormwater Workshop

1. When did Sarasota County establish the Stormwater Environmental Utility (SEU)? 

Answer: 1989

    Backup: The SEU assessments increased dramatically, typically doubling to tripling between 2021 and 2022 (see below):


2. Question: Is there a simple explanation as to why people’s annual stormwater assessments doubled or tripled between 2021 and 2022? What is it in terms of added level of service since 1989 that was presumably needed to justify the significant assessment increase in 2022? In other words, what is it that the County’s stormwater customers can expect to see or expect for the addition assessment expense.

Backup: It is my understanding that the SEU is an Enterprise Fund which means that the revenue it collects can only be used for managing stormwater. It is also my understanding that SEU funds are currently directed to two Departments under Public Works, namely Stormwater and Field Operations.


3. Question: Are my understandings correct? Do you know approximately what the split in funds between these two Departments is? Who if anyone is specifically designated as responsible for the management of the SEU Enterprise Fund?

Backup: Field Operations are responsible for the operation and maintenance of roads, bridges, primary stormwater storage and drainage conveyance systems, and signage/signalization. In addition to receiving a portion of funds from SEU, it is assumed that there are also other funding sources.

Rescue Teams working to get people out of flooded homes due to Hurricane Debby

4. Question: With respect to Fields Operations, what are the sources of revenue besides those from SEU and their approximate percentages? What elements within roadways that are incidental to and needed for the roadway itself (i.e. inlets, stormwater sewer, and roadside swales) are eligible for SEU funds for maintenance?

Backup: The attached document entitled Stormwater Fund 440 Balance Annual Reconciliation dated 04/01/25 indicated that $16,685,748 has been transferred to Fund 441 (Stormwater Capital Projects).


5. Question: Can you help me understand the $16,685,748 in transfers to Fund 441 on 04/01/25? What does SWWRP stand for? In the wake of the maintenance needs exposed by Tropical Storm Debby, has there been any thought to the reprioritization and allocation of these funds to address and mitigate the flooding that occurred?

Backup: Phillippi Creek experienced significant flooding from the rains of Tropical Storm Debby including residents along the Creek between Bee Ridge Road and Beneva Road. Decades of sediment accumulation in Phillippi Creek has been considered a contributor to this flooding.

6. Question: Relative to the accumulation of sediment in Phillippi Creek, what is the County’s plan to remove the sediment and restore its drainage capacity? 

7. Does management of erosion and sediment for drainage in Phillippi Creek (and other man-made waterways) fall under the responsibility of SEU? 

8. Once the sediment is removed and the drainage capacity is restored, does the County have plans to proactively manage sediment in Phillippi Creek to prevent a recurrence in the future?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Flooding in Sarasota County is the topic of SCAN's Oct. 24 Meeting

DR HORTON at the PLANNING COMMISSION Nov. 21

Protect the Celery Fields: Write to the Sarasota County Commission