Questions regarding Pat Neal's proposal for 3H Ranch
The 3-H Ranch planning commission staff report says that 44% of the site is within the AE Flood Zone according to the official county floodplain mapping. (Page E-9)
The SC Comprehensive Plan says floodplains designated as AE are Greenway RMA (GS Policy 1.1)
The comp plan does not permit rezoning Greenway RMA to Village Planned Development (GS Policy 2.3 and 2.6)

So how can Neal propose to develop the 44% of the project that is within the AE floodplain?
Neal included in his application submittal recommendations that re-designates all the official AE floodplains to a lower hazard Floodplain. He said this is based on a "separate analysis."
![]() |
Hmmm... |
Should decisions on rezonings in floodplains - the community's safety - be based on the official county flood map or should the BCC blindly accept whatever a developer's consultant says?
Comments
Post a Comment